The new Harry Potter movie has sparked controversy (to be or not in 3D) among some of the actors.

The film made and distributed by Warner Bros,  in a class of its own, needs no conversion as it self markets superbly in the current form according to Radcliff, one of the actors in the film.

What the actors and distributors are ignoring is the fact that movies in 2 and 3D are more popular with the fans whether expensive or not.

The film maker has tried and failed to create a 3D version of  Deadly Hallows before it makes its debut next week.

The firm said it was not willing to pump extra money in a project it viewed already marketable in the current form, or even destroy it as time was not on their side, as much as 3D might be popular.

The surprising thing is that the company was not even sure the extra costs that could be added and the expected extra revenue it would fetch from Deathly Harrows.

The company said it was contented in the amounts the film was to fetch from the box office in its current form.

The shareholders of Warner Bros are convinced they will have returns for the product as they agreed that making it in 3D would be an expense they would deal with.

Some of the converts did not add value to the film, marketable in its current form, according to David Yates, one of the directors.

The film makers are convinced that the Harry Potter brand name is vastly marketable without any further upgrades or alterations.

Image Credit: